The Kalai-Smorodinsky bargaining solution with loss aversion
نویسندگان
چکیده
We consider bargaining problems under the assumption that players are loss averse, i.e., experience disutility from obtaining an outcome lower than some reference point. We follow the approach of Shalev (2002) by imposing the self-supporting condition on an outcome: an outcome z in a bargaining problem is self-supporting under a given bargaining solution, whenever transforming the problem using outcome z as reference point, yields a transformed problem in which the solution is z. We show that n-player bargaining problems have a unique self-supporting outcome under the Kalai-Smorodinsky solution. For all possible loss aversion coefficients we determine the bargaining solutions that give exactly these outcomes, and characterize them by the standard axioms of Scale Invariance, Individual Monotonicity, and Strong Individual Rationality, and a new axiom called Proportional Concession Invariance (PCI). A bargaining solution satisfies PCI if moving the utopia point in the direction of the solution outcome does not change this outcome. JEL-Classification: C78
منابع مشابه
Strategyproofness, Leontief Economies and the Kalai-Smorodinsky Solution
We present new characterizations of the Raiffa and Kalai-Smorodinsky solutions based on strategyproofness of an allocation mechanism for an underlying economy with Leontief preferences. Our first result shows that the 2-player Kalai-Smorodinsky solution is the unique bargaining solution which if Efficient, Symmetric, Scale Invariant and Strategyproof on a Leontief economy. Next we consider the ...
متن کاملOn the Relevance of Alternatives in Bargaining: Average Alternative Solutions
We compare bargaining solutions in terms of the relevance of alternatives. We show that most well-known bargaining solutions do not use all the alternatives, but there are numerous bargaining solutions that do. We introduce a new class of bargaining solutions called ``average alternative solutions'', characterize them, and show that the Nash solution and the Kalai-Smorodinsky solution are limit...
متن کاملTwo support results for the Kalai-Smorodinsky solution in small object division markets
Wediscuss two support results for the Kalai–Smorodinsky bargaining solution in the context of an object division problem involving two agents. Strategic interaction determines an allocation of objects, so that evaluationwith individual utilities constitute the payoffs in the derived games. These allocations of objects are obtained through individual demand in a specific market for objects. For ...
متن کاملThe n-Person Kalai-Smorodinsky Bargaining Solution under Pre-Donations
This study examines the behavior of simple n-person bargaining problems under pre-donations where the Kalai-Smorodinsky (KS) solution is operant. Pre-donations are a unilateral commitment to transfer a portion of one’s utility to someone else, and are used to distort the bargaining set and thereby influence the bargaining solution. In equilibrium, these pre-donations are Pareto-improving over t...
متن کاملStability, Fairness and Random Walks in the Bargaining Problem
We study the classical bargaining problem and its two canonical solutions, (Nash and Kalai-Smorodinsky), from a novel point of view: we ask for stability of the solution if both players are able distort the underlying bargaining process by reference to a third party (e.g. a court). By exploring the simplest case, where decisions of the third party are made randomly we obtain a stable solution, ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Mathematical Social Sciences
دوره 61 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011